Thailand and Cambodia have shared a deep-rooted civilization since ancient times, dating back over 1,000 years to the Suvarnabhumi era. The two nations have long been geographically divided by mountain ranges and watersheds, which eventually evolved into today’s clearly defined administrative boundaries.
The most recent clashes in July 2025, resulting in both military and civilian casualties, stem from conflicting map references used by each side. This article from MyContent revisits the historical roots of this conflict and explains why Cambodia uses a 1:200,000 scale map while Thailand uses a 1:50,000 map.
Several Cambodian provinces were once under Siamese (Thai) sovereignty, particularly before the Franco-Siamese Treaties of 1904 and 1907, when France pressured Thailand to cede territory to French Indochina, including areas that now form part of Cambodia:
Controlled by Thailand as “Phra Tabong” since 1785 (Rama I era)
Directly administered by Thailand for over 100 years
Evidence includes Thai-stamped travel documents
Once under Siam as “Siemmarat” or “Sri Sanphet”
Home to historic sites like Angkor Wat and Preah Vihear Temple
Strategically important during Siam’s expansion into Khmer territory
Now part of Banteay Meanchey Province
A frontier town historically used by Thailand for military campaigns into Cambodia
During the reign of King Rama V, Thailand ceded Battambang, Siem Reap, and Sisophon
In exchange, France returned parts of Trat Province and nearby islands in the Gulf of Thailand
Thailand (then Siam) faced immense geopolitical pressure from French imperialism
After the Paknam Incident in 1893 (R.S. 112 Crisis), France forced Siam to surrender territory east of the Mekong (e.g., Luang Prabang, Champasak)
France used salami tactics to gradually claim more land
In 1904, France returned Chanthaburi but seized Trat
Thailand traded the Khmer provinces to regain Trat and nearby islands
Recognized that military resistance was unwise against a colonial empire
Opted for diplomacy to preserve national sovereignty
Prioritized long-term independence over short-term territorial control
The long-standing border dispute arises from different map interpretations—Cambodia uses a 1:200,000 scale map, while Thailand uses a 1:50,000 scale map. This issue dates back to the Franco-Siamese treaties and remains unresolved even in 2025.
Produced by French cartographers during the colonial era
Included with the 1904/1907 treaties
Cambodia sees this as a historic legal document
Referenced during the 2025 Joint Border Commission (JBC) meetings
Note: In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled Preah Vihear Temple belonged to Cambodia, but did not endorse the 1:200,000 map as a definitive border.
More accurate and detailed, widely used for modern topography
Developed after WWII, enhanced between 2003–2006 using SPOT5 satellite images and WGS 84
Thailand uses it for internal border demarcation and military patrols
Cambodia does not recognize it as a legal reference, claiming it’s a unilateral Thai product
Rooted in interpretations of the 1904/1907 Franco-Siamese treaties
Treaties referred to watershed lines and French-drawn maps (1:200,000)
1962: ICJ awarded Preah Vihear Temple to Cambodia but didn’t define borders precisely
Thailand uses 1:50,000 maps for technical and statistical purposes, but they are not internationally recognized
The 2025 border skirmishes stem from conflicting map claims and refusal to mutually recognize each other's maps
Ongoing JBC negotiations: Cambodia insists on 1:200,000; Thailand calls for bilateral talks using 1:50,000
Even without official territorial conflict over Ko Kut, the area holds high strategic and economic value. Both countries claim a ~27,000 sq. km. zone in the Gulf of Thailand, suspected to contain:
Natural gas (11 trillion cubic feet)
Oil and condensate deposits
Cambodia’s coast:
Mostly shallow and muddy (e.g., Koh Kong, Kampot)
Only one deep-sea port: Sihanoukville
Thailand’s advantage:
Ko Kut is near vital shipping lanes and Koh Kong
Better geological systems, making exploration easier
Thailand has advanced infrastructure and companies like PTTEP for offshore energy
Thailand holds the upper hand in the disputed maritime zone, due to:
Superior technology, exploration capacity, and energy infrastructure
OCA lies within the Pattani Basin, a major gas field for Thailand
Thailand had previously removed OCA from its National Energy Plan 2024 due to negotiation deadlock. However, if joint development proceeds, Thailand could still benefit more—even under a 50:50 revenue-sharing model—thanks to better readiness.
The Thai–Cambodian border dispute is a complex issue rooted in colonial-era treaties, modern-day map interpretations, and economic interests, particularly in the energy-rich Gulf of Thailand. With high stakes on both sides, particularly around Ko Kut and maritime energy resources, diplomatic negotiation remains the only path to a peaceful resolution.
Geopolitical Monitor. (2025, July 24). Thailand-Cambodia Border Dispute: Faultlines of Nationalism. Retrieved from https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/thailand-cambodia-border-dispute-faultlines-of-nationalism/
Khmer Times. (2025, July 28). Thailand and Its Unilateral Maps of the Border Dispute: The Back Story Revealed. Retrieved from https://www.khmertimeskh.com/501700171/thailand-and-its-unilateral-maps-of-the-border-dispute-the-back-story-revealed/
Malay Mail. (2025, July 28). When Maps Can Lead to Serious Conflict: Another Thorn in the Thai-Cambodian Border Dispute by Phar Kim Beng. Retrieved from https://www.malaymail.com/news/what-you-think/2025/07/28/when-maps-can-lead-to-serious-conflict-another-thorn-in-the-thai-cambodian-border-dispute-phar-kim-beng/185452
Nation Thailand. (2025, July). Thai-Cambodian Border Dispute Escalates Again After Map Disagreement. Retrieved from https://www.nationthailand.com/news/asean/40051324
Reddit. (2025). Why Has Thailand Rejected the ICJ Process? Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/Thailand/comments/1lbrs8a/why_has_thailand_rejected_the_icj_process/
Reuters. (2025, July 26). Thai-Cambodian Fighting Extends into Third Day Despite Ceasefire Calls. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/thai-cambodian-fighting-extends-into-third-day-despite-ceasefire-calls-2025-07-26/
Reuters. (2025, July 28). Cambodia Says Ceasefire in Place, But Thailand Questions Sincerity. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/china/cambodia-says-immediate-ceasefire-purpose-talks-thailand-questions-its-sincerity-2025-07-28/
United Nations Statistics Division. (2006). Geographical Names and Mapping Standards in Thailand. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/rcc/docs/rccap17/crp/17th_UNRCCAP_econf.97_5_CRP1.pdf
Wikipedia contributors. (2025, July). Provinces of Cambodia. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_of_Cambodia
Wikipedia contributors. (2025, July). Cambodia–Thailand border. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodia–Thailand_border
Wikipedia contributors. (2025, July). 2025 Cambodia–Thailand Border Conflict. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Cambodia–Thailand_border_conflict
Nashaplaneta.net. (2023). Cambodian Checkpoints: Map and Tourist Guide. Retrieved from https://nashaplaneta.net/asia/cambo/cambo-checkpoint-karta_en
IntoCambodia.org. (2024). Cambodian Provinces Overview. Retrieved from https://intocambodia.org/category/province
Kambodscha-Botschaft.de. (2023). Kambodscha Provinzen – Informationen. Retrieved from https://www.kambodscha-botschaft.de/city_info/webaccessibility/index.cfm?item_id=868585&waid=726
Bangkok Post. (2013, September 18). Mapping Siam: History Through Cartography. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/life/travel/371554/mapping-siam-history